Gamma Ray Bursts an...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Gamma Ray Bursts and Extinctions

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Likes
82 Views
Dave Pottinton
(@dave-pottinton)
Posts: 6
Active Member
Topic starter
 

A version of this paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2506

appeared in Phy Rev Letters at the end of last year. So whilst I'm no expert, (clearly), I would assume the underlying model and assumptions are sensible. (As the paper states it's been known for ~20 years that gamma ray bursts could cause extinctions). I'm not sure how much is novel but the abstract gives a good summary:

As a copious source of gamma-rays, a nearby Galactic Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) can be a threat to life. Using recent determinations of the rate of GRBs, their luminosity function and properties of their host galaxies, we estimate the probability that a life-threatening (lethal) GRB would take place. Amongst the different kinds of GRBs, long ones are most dangerous. There is a very good chance (but no certainty) that at least one lethal GRB took place during the past 5 Gyr close enough to Earth as to significantly damage life. There is a 50% chance that such a lethal GRB took place during the last 500 Myr causing one of the major mass extinction events. Assuming that a similar level of radiation would be lethal to life on other exoplanets hosting life, we explore the potential effects of GRBs to life elsewhere in the Galaxy and the Universe. We find that the probability of a lethal GRB is much larger in the inner Milky Way (95% within a radius of 4 kpc from the galactic center), making it inhospitable to life. Only at the outskirts of the Milky Way, at more than 10 kpc from the galactic center, this probability drops below 50%. When considering the Universe as a whole, the safest environments for life (similar to the one on Earth) are the lowest density regions in the outskirts of large galaxies and life can exist in only ~ 10% of galaxies. Remarkably, a cosmological constant is essential for such systems to exist. Furthermore, because of both the higher GRB rate and galaxies being smaller, life as it exists on Earth could not take place at z>0.5. Early life forms must have been much more resilient to radiation.

 
Posted : 19/01/2015 11:04 pm
Andy Sawers
(@andy-sawers)
Posts: 742
Honorable Member
 

Wow! What a great find, Dave! A really interesting perspective.

Maybe we need to add another element to the Drake equation: "Probability that a gamma ray burst destroys all life on an exoplanet and so it has to start all over again".

 
Posted : 20/01/2015 10:40 am
Clive Inglis
(@clive-inglis)
Posts: 58
Trusted Member
 

The following link gives real-time information on gamma ray bursts detected by the Gamma ray Coordinates Network (GCN), graphically displaying the celestial location of the source.

http://grb.sonoma.edu/

It appears that, due to their affect on the ionosphere, some of the more energetic gamma-ray bursts might be detectable by our VLF SID receiver.

 
Posted : 22/01/2015 8:10 am
Share: